Specialty
Aesthetics Cardiology Cataract & Refractive Dermatology General Ophthalmology Glaucoma Interventional Cardiology Interventional Radiology Neurology Optometry Pain Management Retina Women's Health View All Courses
Course Type
Supplement Multimedia Webinar In-Person Multi-Part Collection
Search
Log In

Ocular Surface Disease: Etiologies and Treatment Modalities

By: Marc Bloomenstein, OD, FAAO; Preeya K. Gupta, MD; Jennifer Loh, MD; Francis Mah, MD; and Leslie O’Dell, OD, FAAO

Supplement Credits: 1.0

This continuing medical education (CME/CE) activity captures content from a roundtable discussion.

ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
Nearly 33% of patients in eye care clinics present with complaints about dry eye signs and symptoms. Clinicians remain challenged with both the diagnosis and best treatment options for dry eye disease (DED) because, to date, multiple causes of the disorder have been identified. This activity will help to inform clinicians on methods to improve the care of patients with DED.

TARGET AUDIENCE
This certified CE/CME activity is designed for eye care providers who care for patients with ocular surface disease.

Expiration Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2024
Release Date: February 22, 2021

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, the participant should be able to:

  • Differentiate between DED and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and summarize the risk factors for DED and MGD.
  • Explain the role of inflammatory processes in these diseases.
  • Recognize the signs and symptoms in patients with ocular surface complaints.
  • Appraise the differences between traditional and new diagnostic tests for DED and MGD.
  • Compare the newest treatments for DED and MGD with first-generation treatments indicated for those conditions.

Accreditation and Designation Statement

Provided by Evolve Medical Education LLC

Evolve Medical Education LLC (Evolve) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Evolve Medical Education designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Evolve is an approved COPE administrator.
Supported by State University of New York College of Optometry

COPE Approved for 1 credit hour.
Course ID: 71293-AS
Activity ID: 121126

Participation Method

TO OBTAIN CREDIT
To obtain credit for this activity, you must read the activity in its entirety and complete the Pretest/Posttest/Activity Evaluation/Satisfaction Measures Form, which consists of a series of multiple-choice questions.

Course Viewing Requirements

Supported Browsers:
Internet Explorer 11 for Windows
Edge (recent versions; Chromium-based) for Windows
Google Chrome (recent versions) for Windows, Mac OS, iOS, Android, or Linux
Mozilla Firefox (recent versions) for Windows, Mac OS, iOS, Android, or Linux
Safari (recent versions) for Mac OSX, or iOS

Hardware Requirements:
4GB+ RAM

Recommended internet speed 5Mbps+

Faculty and Disclosures

Jennifer Loh, MD
Founder
Loh Ophthalmology Associates
Miami, FL

 


Marc Bloomenstein, OD, FAAO
Schwartz Laser Eye Center
Director of Optometric Services
Scottsdale, AZ

 


Preeya K. Gupta, MD
Associate Professor of Ophthalmology
Cornea & Refractive Surgery
Duke University Eye Center
Durham, NC

 


Francis Mah, MD
Director of Corneal and External Disease
Co-Director of Refractive Surgery
Scripps Clinic
La Jolla, CA

 


Leslie O’Dell, OD, FAAO
Clinical Director
Medical Optometry America
York, PA

 

DISCLOSURE POLICY
It is the policy of Evolve that faculty and other individuals who are in the position to control the content of this activity disclose any real or apparent conflicts of interest relating to the topics of this educational activity. Evolve has full policies in place that will identify and resolve all conflicts of interest prior to this educational activity.

The following faculty/staff members have the following financial relationships with commercial interests:
Jennier Loh, MD, has had a financial agreement or affiliation during the past year with the following commercial interests in the form of Consultant: Allergan, Eyevance, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Kala, Novartis, and Sight Sciences. Grant/Research Support: Sight Sciences. Speaker’s Bureau: Aerie, Kala, Sight Sciences, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. Stock/Shareholder: Novabay.

Marc Bloomenstein, OD, FAAO, has had a financial agreement or affiliation during the past year with the following commercial interests in the form of Consultant: Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Biotissue, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Kala, OcuSoft, Reichert, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. Speaker’s Bureau: Alcon, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Eyevance, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Kala, Novartis, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries.

Preeya K. Gupta, MD, has had a financial agreement or affiliation during the past year with the following commercial interests in the form of Consultant: Alcon Vision, Allergan, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Eyevance, HanAll Biopharma, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Kala, New World Medical, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Oyster Point, ReGen Tree, Sight Sciences, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Tear Lab, and Tissue Tech.

Francis Mah, MD, has had a financial agreement or affiliation during the past year with the following commercial interests in the form of Consultant: Alcon Vision, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Eyenovia, Glaukos, iView, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Nevakar, Novartis, Ocular Science, and RxSight.

Leslie O’Dell, OD, FAAO, has had a financial agreement or affiliation during the past year with the following commercial interests in the form of Consultant: Bausch + Lomb, Eye Eco, and Novartis. Speaker’s Bureau: Eye Eco, Sight Sciences, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. Share/Stockholder: Eason Labs and EyeGENE.

EDITORIAL SUPPORT DISCLOSURES
The Evolve staff and planners have no financial relationships with commercial interests. Michelle Dalton, writer, and Nisha Mukherjee, MD, peer reviewer, have no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Disclaimer

OFF-LABEL STATEMENT
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.

DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed in this educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of Evolve, Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today, Modern Optometry, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, or Sight Sciences.

Pretest

  • a. 1b. 2c. 3d. 4e. 5
  • a. 1b. 2c. 3d. 4e. 5

Dry eye is a multifactorial ocular surface disease (OSD) characterized by hyperosmolarity and an unstable tear film, leading to inflammation and damage to the ocular surface.1 Dry eye has an adverse impact on patient eye health and quality of life, causing blurry vision, reflex tearing, photophobia, and chronic sensations of burning, stinging, and dryness.2 It’s the most common reason for contact lens drop-out and negatively impacts the outcomes of cataract and refractive surgery.3-5 OSD and dry eye are already extremely common—up to 50% of the global population has dry eye symptoms—yet their prevalence is increasing.6 In the era of COVID-19, increased screen time, decreased blink rates, and air leakage from ill-fitting face masks are ushering in a new dry eye epidemic.7-10 The following roundtable brings together experts to discuss OSD diagnosis, treatment, and management.

— Jennifer Loh, MD, Moderator

THE ROLE AND IMPACT OF OSD ON REFRACTIVE SUCCESS AND PATIENT SATISFACTION

DEFINING DRY EYE
Q | JENNIFER LOH, MD: The phrase “dry eye” is often a catch-all for a wide variety of ocular surface issues. In 2017, the Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II (TFOS DEWS) provided much-needed clarity and updated the definition of dry eye to “a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film, and accompanied by ocular symptoms, in which tear film instability and hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and neurosensory abnormalities play etiological roles.”1 What is dry eye, and how do you describe it to a patient?

Marc Bloomenstein, OD, FAAO: That is the million-dollar question. The utterance of the phrase “dry eye” is often confusing to patients because of the emotional attachment to the word “dry”; patients will internalize their own perception of what they think that should mean. I start by explaining to patients that dry eye is a disease state that is predicated on changing the quality of their tears, which impacts the quality of their vision.11,12
Our daily lives, from using computers and other screens to the environment we live in, have a profound impact on the quality of our tears. Computer vision syndrome, which can develop if screens are used for more than 3 hours per day, causes eye strain, irritation, burning sensation, redness, and blurred and double vision due to decreased and incomplete blinks.13-16 Adverse environmental conductions, such as air pollution, low humidity, and air conditioning use, can be significant contributing factors to OSD.17,18 We know that aging changes the quality of the tear film, largely due to the increased expression of inflammatory molecules such as interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, and matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), which leads to immune homeostasis, tissue remodeling, and dysregulation of the ocular surface.19 Systemic diseases, such as diabetes, Sjögren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, also change the quality of the tear film.20-23
When you don’t have quality tears, you don’t have quality vision. I describe dry eye as something that will ultimately affect the quality of their vision in everything they want to accomplish.

Dr. Loh: We know that there are different etiologies of dry eye, including aqueous deficient, evaporative, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and even a mixed mechanism. How do you differentiate between them?

Francis Mah, MD: The natural human tear is made up of many components: an aqueous component, a lipid component, and a mucin component. The aqueous and lipid components are the most variable. When people think of dry eyes, they often assume it’s an aqueous deficient issue. However, in reality 90% of dry eye is mixed mechanism.1 There’s a lipid component that’s either MGD or blepharitis resulting in evaporative dry eye,24 and then there’s aqueous deficient, which is associated with the accessory lacrimal glands and that system.25

Leslie O’Dell, OD, FAAO: The updated TFOS DEWS II classification system blended aqueous deficient and evaporative dry eye. They are no longer considered two separate types of dry eye; instead, they exist together on continuum.1 I agree with this reclassification; the majority of dry eye I see is mixed mechanism. Cases are typically more heavily weighted in either an aqueous direction or meibomian gland/evaporative direction. Ancillary testing such as tear film osmolarity, inflammatory biomarkers, and meibomian gland imaging helps me determine the primary component and my treatment plan, which tends to be a combined approach.26

HOW OSD AND MGD IMPACT CONTACT LENS WEAR AND DROP OUT
Q | DR. LOH: Contact lens drop-out (CLD) rates are as high as 27%, with half of contact lens wears dropping out in the first 3 years.3,27 What is the cause of this drop-out?

Dr. O’Dell: I think a lot of drop-out is contributed to MGD, but many of our colleagues simply accept CLD and don’t look for a reason. My first question to a physician, when evaluating a patient who has abandoned contact lenses, is what did their glands look like? If you don’t have healthy meibomian glands, you don’t have a healthy lipid layer. Then you’re putting a prosthetic device onto the ocular surface, splitting the tears. If you’re using contact lenses in an unhealthy environment to begin with, it’s going to be more of a challenge for patients to have successful contact lens wear. But if you can improve the quality of the tear that you’re placing the contact lens on, you can have successful wearability, even beyond the presbyopic years. We have great technology now with multifocal contact lenses. Some patients can tolerate lenses well into their 70s if we really pay attention to the tear film.

Dr. Bloomenstein: The conventional way of thinking about CLD was to blame the lens material or the solution; we looked to everything except the environment the lens was sitting on. Contacts are a medically controlled device that sit on a very fragile area, and we expect our patients to maintain it. Dumbleton et al conducted a CLD study and found that the percentage of patients dropping out at around 40 to 50 years old didn’t change between the 1990s and 2000s. About 23% of those surveyed had discontinued contact use permanently due to discomfort and dryness. To Dr. O’Dell’s point, MGD plays a large role in the drop-out rate.28

Dr. Loh: How do you manage a patient who comes to you and says their contacts are no longer comfortable? Do you switch brands and suggest a different solution, or do you give them a dry eye workup?

Dr. Bloomenstein: Every contact lens assessment should be a dry eye evaluation. I don’t see how you can differentiate the two. If you want great results from contact lenses, you have to know if the environment can withstand it. The assessment should include a general slit lamp biomicroscopic examination, eyelid assessment, ocular surface examination, and evaluation of the tear film and lipid layer (Figure 1).29

Figure

Figure 1. Dry eye disease diagnostic testing from TFOS DEWS II.29

Dr. Loh: After you tell a patient they have OSD or MGD, they often say they’ve worn contact lenses for 25 years and never had a problem. How do you explain why this change is happening to them now?

Dr. Bloomenstein: I explain that the things we’re doing to our eyes, especially sitting in front of a screen for hours at a time, were not available to us 20 to 30 years ago. The modern-day demands on our eyes have increased inflammation. We’re not blinking as often as we should while using computers, and that affects layers of our tear film.
Estimates on blink rate decline vary, but it is significant.30 A study from Patel et al found that patients had a mean 18.4 blinks a minute at baseline before using a computer, which dropped to 3.6 blinks a minute during computer use.31 Tsubota et al studied the blink rates of office workers, finding 22 blinks a minute at baseline, which was reduced to 7 blinks per minute while viewing an electronic display.32

THE OCULAR SURFACE AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Q | DR. LOH: Do you often have patients consult with you for refractive surgery because they are no longer able to tolerate their contact lenses? And, as a follow-up, do you attribute most of this to dry eye disease (DED)?

Dr. Mah: The real emphasis for dry eye research and for the concentrated efforts in trying to address dry eyes, in my opinion, was refractive surgery. Dry eye has always been in the background, but it wasn’t critical to surgeons until refractive surgery. Refractive surgery can exacerbate dry eye.33-35 Patients will have great results, but the one major complaint is dry eye.36 This pushed and motivated people into looking for better therapies for dry eye, as well as to identify people at risk for dry eye. I do think there is a huge population of people who can no longer wear contacts. This is pushing them into the optometrist, ophthalmologist, or refractive surgeon’s office because they don’t want to wear glasses.
That said, dry eye is not the only cause of CLD. Patients can have a bad case of giant papillary conjunctivitis or a strange fit.37 There are various issues that bring people into the refractive surgeon’s office.

Dr. Bloomenstein: Patients perceive that if they want to have LASIK, that they can’t wear their contacts. However, the Patient Reported Outcomes with LASIK (PROWL) study, which was reported a couple of years ago, found that most patients improved their dry eye symptoms after LASIK, as opposed to before LASIK.38 I believe there are more issues with the tear film than we think, which is inhibiting patients from achieving comfortable, good vision with their contacts.

Preeya K. Gupta, MD: I cannot agree more with these comments. An optimal tear film, especially in the perioperative setting, is a critical component to surgical success. We have access to so much technology today, both in cataract and refractive surgery, but without that healthy tear film, we really can’t take advantage of it.
The PHACO study showed us that our patients are coming in with a lot of corneal staining and reduced tear breakup time (TBUT).5 Mean TBUT was 4.95 seconds; more than 80% of patients had a TBUT of 7 seconds or less. Additionally, about 77% of patients were positive for fluorescein staining, and 50% showed positive central staining as well. Fewer than 25% of patients had been previously diagnosed with DED at presentation for cataract surgery, but 30% reported at least occasional dry eye symptoms.
My colleagues and I published a study about 2 years ago on the prevalence of OSD in patients presenting for cataract surgery evaluation.39 The study included 120 patients, 69% of whom were women, with a mean age of 69. A total of 80% of the patients had at least one sign of OSD based on their corneal exam with fluorescein, tear osmolarity, and/or tear MMP-9 levels. We’ve all had a patient who has cataract surgery and is technically 20/20 postoperatively, but who says they can’t see. That is a classic patient who has decompensated DED and became symptomatic postoperatively. We need to assume that every patient has some form of OSD when they present for cataract surgery evaluation.

Dr. Loh: Dr. Bloomenstein, you work in a large laser refractive center. How are your patients’ refractive surgery results affected by OSD?

Dr. Bloomenstein: Interestingly enough, when we first started doing refractive surgery 20 or 30 years ago, we didn’t understand the importance of the tear film or the quality of the tears and how they affected refractive outcomes. I had patients who felt they needed an enhancement or that their surgical results weren’t as optimal as they hoped. I’d look at their corneas and see superficial punctate staining. I’d examine their meibomian glands and see blepharitis consistent with DED. Treating and managing those issues made a huge difference in their vision.
The PHACO study elucidated that patients referred for cataract surgery often have fluctuating vision. We need to be looking at typography or tomography. We need to watch the tear film as it’s evaporating and assess how it’s changing the quality of that image. That’s one of the first tests that we can do with patients. We need to prepare the ocular surface before conducting any preoperative testing, and then really emphasize the postoperative treatment to sustain and maintain the good quality of vision that our patients expect.

Dr. O’Dell: I was very excited to see the studies by Trattler et al and Dr. Gupta; both studies clearly illustrated the problem. Patients with DED are referred to us, and oftentimes they don’t know they have DED. This leads to further delays in care, which can be very frustrating from a surgeon’s perspective. Optometrists need to conduct a presurgical dry eye exam on all patients before sending them for surgical referral so that surgeons are working with an optimal ocular surface and the best looking lids without care delays. Preoperative measures will be accurate, and you’ll feel confident that you’ve hit the mark on your postsurgical outcomes.

Q | DR. LOH: That’s great advice. Having patients prepare before their cataract or refractive surgery evaluation is critical. How does surgery affect dry eye?

Dr. Mah: Everything we do during surgery, the eye drops, the incision, the saline solution, causes an acute inflammatory reaction, which potentially exacerbates the OSD. We’ve all had patients who are 20/20 postoperatively and complain that something happened during surgery. They believe something has been left in their eye during surgery that feels like a grain of sand, or the lens is moving, or the incision is not completely closed. They swear something is wrong, even if everything looks good from our perspective. The drops, the incision, and the inflammation caused by cataract surgery or LASIK, pushes people with OSD over the edge, even if they’ve never experienced dry eye symptoms. In order to address the dry eye afterward, you must get in front of the problem before surgery.

Dr. Loh: As you mentioned, patients swear up and down that they did not have DED before the surgery and now they do. I think that is a typical response from a lot of people. How do you explain this change to patients, that the DED was already there?

Dr. Gupta: It’s difficult when they don’t know about their DED ahead of time. We need do to everything possible so they understand they have two conditions: cataracts plus DED. That’s the best position to be in from a physician perspective. If you don’t have that conversation with them ahead of time because it wasn’t diagnosed or it was an outside referral, the next strategy is to depersonalize it, take out the upset feelings, and explain that dry eye is a chronic disease.
There’s also a difference between short-term and long-term symptoms. As mentioned, there are many aspects of the actual surgical procedure that can exacerbate dry eye—topical medications, benzalkonium chloride exposure, temporary neurotropism caused by surgical incisions, and so on. I try to set realistic expectations. Based on the available literature, it takes about 3 to 6 months for patients to be back to where they were before surgery.34 What can we do to rehabilitate the ocular surface? If it’s within the first month after surgery, I take the offending medications away. I also aggressively lubricate the eye. I have a very low threshold to switch to nonpreserved molecules, whether that’s in tears or other topical medications. Modulating inflammation and addressing untreated MGD can play important roles in treating these patients.

Dr. Bloomenstein: The mantra of every eye clinician, regardless of how, who, or what they treat, is to assume the patient has DED. We’re seeing this condition in younger and younger patients. A study of dry eye in pediatric patients by Dr. Gupta found a high level of mild meibomian gland atrophy in patients age 4 to 17 years.40 Moderate to severe meibomian gland atrophy was present in this population as well.
Another important point is that when you talk about a side effect before surgery, that becomes an expectation. When something happens and you don’t mention it, then it becomes a complication. I tell my patients that we may see more OSD, or dysfunctional tears, after surgery, which we may have to address. I also explain that they should start to feel better after about a month, but if not, there may be other issues we have to work on. The assumption is that the OSD is there beforehand.

Dr. Loh: We have to diagnose OSD and DED in advance, otherwise it’s hard to explain afterward.

TOOLS TO DIAGNOSE DRY EYE AND MGD
Q | DR. LOH:
I’d like to discuss more about how to incorporate dry eye diagnostics into our practice. What do you do in order to start that conversation for dry eye?

Dr. O’Dell: I like to screen all patients, and I do like to use a questionnaire. There are several questionnaires available (Table 1). I use a questionnaire for follow-up appointments as well, because it helps me see where we are on the symptom scale and if the treatments are working. Of course, I want to see that the clinical endpoints improve, but patients do care about their symptoms. If, for some reason, the survey is worse than it was during the previous appointment, I try to determine what has changed; it could be something in their lifestyle, a new medication, or environmental.

Figure

Dr. O’Dell: I also lean heavily on point-of-care testing. We perform osmolarity and MMP-9 on all of our patients and continue to follow that during follow-up appointments. Meibography, which provides a visual of the meibomian glands, is incredible technology.41 Seeing is believing. When I show those images to patients, they get it and become more invested in their treatment. Even if you only have access to anterior segment cameras, it really helps paint the picture for what you’re seeing clinically.

Dr. Loh: What are your two most utilized dry eye diagnostics?

Dr. O’Dell: I really love lissamine green for dye staining because I uncover a lot of hidden inflammation.29 Meibography is a favorite of mine as well.

Dr. Bloomenstein: I like meibography, too, because a picture is worth a thousand words. I’m not as excited about lissamine green as Dr. O’Dell. I don’t believe it gives me enough information. What I really enjoy doing is having a patient look at topography and ask them point blank if their vision is clearer when they blink or if I put artificial tears in their eyes.

Dr. Loh: Technology certainly plays a large role in how we diagnose patients, but one of the easiest, simplest, free things you can do is just check a patient’s vision and ask the history. You can take it back to the basics without expensive diagnostic equipment. Along those lines, do you use your staff for dry eye testing or are you testing patients in the moment?

Dr. Gupta: In an ideal world, the testing would be conducted by staff and I would interpret the data and explain it to patients in a salient way, so they understand my thought process and logic as to why I’m making a DED diagnosis. Like Dr. O’Dell, I like to have patients fill out a questionnaire at each appointment. Patients are not the best historians, so it helps to have a snapshot of their symptoms when they were in the office as a data point. We also do a standard examination, checking vision and pressure.
I also think that meibography makes me a better clinician. I’ve often been fooled, assuming a patient did not have gland atrophy only to find on their meibography that severe atrophy is present. The treatment urgency in that case is much higher than in someone without gland atrophy. It also helps me set expectations with patients and educate them on their disease. I try to break patients of linear thinking where they believe DED is something that can be cured; it’s a chronic disease that needs constant treatment over time.
I also like MMP-9 and osmolarity testing. You can evaluate patients without these tools, but they can be very helpful to identify different subtypes of OSD. For example, a normal osmolarity in a setting of typical dry eye symptoms should point you to other conditions like ocular allergy or recurrent erosion, which may require more screening tests until you have a complete understanding of the picture of what’s going on.51,52
I like to use the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) algorithms and LLPP—look, lift, pull, push—because I think it very efficiently makes me look at all of the different components of the ocular surface, including how the patient is blinking and the quality of their meibum (Figure 2).53 Look at the eyelids and tear quality and quantity. Look for signs of blepharitis, of discharge and mucus, and of conjunctival scarring. Lift and pull up on the upper eyelid. Push on the lower eyelid and express the meibomian glands to assess the quality and flow of the meibum. In addition to dry eye, this algorithm can also show signs for less common conditions like superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis or anterior basement membrane dystrophy with erosions.

Figure

Figure 2. ASCRS Preoperative Ocular Surface Disease Algorithm.53

Dr. Mah: I agree with everyone that meibography has established itself as the one test that not only gives us vital information as clinicians but is also a great educational tool for patients. I also like osmolarity and MMP-9. Again, a simple vision evaluation is a really effective dry eye test. The other thing that’s important for patients to know is we can actually improve their vision by treating their DED. Finally, clinicians need a dry eye algorithm, even if it’s your own.

Dr. Gupta: The ASCRS Corneal Clinical Committee algorithm includes five basic steps. The first step is taking noninvasive refractive preoperative measurements like keratometry, topography, optical biometry, and aberrometry. Step 2 is OSD tear film testing, including osmolarity and inflammatory marker testing, followed by a symptom assessment using the ASCRS SPEED II questionnaire. Step 3 is an exam to look for visually significant OSD, using LLPP. In Step 4, you determine if the patient has OSD, and if so, whether it is visually significant or not. Finally, Step 5 is treatment of DED when present.53
The algorithm is not meant to be a hard stop. However, we recommend assessing symptoms with a questionnaire and using point-of-care testing. If you don’t have access to point-of-care testing, you can still participate in the algorithm. My favorite inexpensive piece of equipment is actually just strips of fluorescein. You can measure TBUT, you can see corneal and conjunctival staining, and you can look at the pattern of tear degradation on the corneal surface to see if there’s excessive breakdown. There are lots of ways to participate. It’s meant to be inclusive, and it doesn’t have to be difficult.

Dr. Mah: I agree. Clinicians often see an algorithm and think they can’t participate if they don’t have the recommended equipment. The goal of the ASCRS algorithm was to develop something reproducible and proven. The underlying goal was to have clinicians consider it and then incorporate what they could.

Dr. Bloomenstein: You can’t cookie cut this multifactorial disease state. Sometimes doctors get overwhelmed and feel they can’t meet the expectations, so they revert back to the old school method of diagnosing dry eye, which is to let patients tell us if they have it or not. Algorithms are designed to give you a framework that each clinician needs to personalize for their own patients. The sooner we start treating OSD, the better off the patient will be. It’s not as complicated or as challenging as a lot of our colleagues think it is.

TREATING OSD AND MGD WITH CURRENT TREATMENTS & THERAPIES
Q | DR. LOH: Say a new patient with a history of dry eye presents in your office. She has a decreased TBUT and stage 2 MGD. She’s tried artificial tears, but no prescription medications. Where do you start the conversation?

Dr. O’Dell: Often a new patient will present who has never been on physician-directed therapy; they’ve self-medicated with artificial tears. I start the conversation by laying a good foundation of what the disease state is. I also educate them on the role inflammation plays in DED, whether we are dealing with aqueous or evaporative. I start with short-term treatments that target the inflammation, then move on to long-term medications like cyclosporine and lifitegrast.
Cyclosporine is not a quick fix; it can take up to 6 months to achieve maximum clinical benefit.54 Side effects include stinging and burning.55 It can be taken once daily if the side effects are bothersome, but it is most effective up to four times daily. Lifitegrast is a twice-daily medication that reduces inflammation by inhibiting lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1. Side effects include eye irradiation and blurred vision.56
In a patient with severe MGD, I also discuss the importance of therapeutic at-home maintenance with a heat mask and the use of omega-3 fatty acid supplements to help the secretions of the glands. The evidence on omega-3s for dry eye is inconsistent, but a large trial of 32,000 women did find that women who consumed the most omega-3s from fish had a 17% lower risk of dry eye compared with women who didn’t.57
Other in-office options are thermal pulsation, intense pulsed light, or other new treatments (Table 2). These include a handheld device that applies heat and compression via a sterile, single-patient use disposable tip under direct visualization to treat MGD; a thermal pulsation system for MGD consisting of a console and a single-use sterile device; and an electrothermal controller that delivers regulated and adjustable heat via single-use devices that are affixed to the upper and lower lids.58,59

Figure

Dr. O’Dell: Thermal pulsation is a one-two punch of heat and pressure that liquefies the meibum and clears the glands. The effects can last up to a year.60
My conversation goes back to what we were saying earlier: This is a multifactorial disease. Patients often want to know what’s the one thing that caused their DED, but there’s not one thing. It could be their age. They could have started on a new medication.61 It could be that putting contact lenses in for many years disrupted goblet cells on the conjunctiva.62 Those things will impact the way that their tears are produced and the quality of those tears. Their environment and lifestyle choices also play a big role. Screen time, computer use, cosmetics—all of these things contribute.63 I discuss all those factors with the patient and how we’re going to work toward a solid anti-inflammatory foundation so we can build upon that with a meibomian gland clearing treatment.

Dr. Bloomenstein: I like to engage the patient in their treatment so they understand why they’re doing it. I tell patients that we have a chicken and egg scenario. When looking at the meibomian gland, for example, we have obstruction, we may start to see atrophy or tortuosity, and there may be a capped gland. The obstruction is inducing inflammation. On one hand, the meibomian gland secretion must improve. We’ll talk about home remedies like warm compresses and moist heat. I’ll recommend incorporating lid hygiene, rinsing the lashes with warm water, and removing all eye makeup. If those things aren’t efficacious, we’ll discuss thermal pulsation. But these treatments are only for the obstruction, not the inflammation. I also reach for an anti-inflammatory immunomodulatory such as cyclosporine or lifitegrast. The goal is to reduce the inflammation in addition to improving the obstruction. I give them a road map of what to expect.

Dr. Loh: We know that many patients have mixed mechanism OSD. They are coming in with meibomian gland issues, aqueous deficiency, and some inflammation. If you have a patient like this, what is your first step? Do you prefer more of a medication, or do you prefer more of a procedural-based approach?

Dr. Mah: I have come up with a strategy to address all the different components of their disease. I treat them with everything. Many people who come in don’t know they have OSD, either because it’s their first visit or because they’ve been misdiagnosed with allergies, conjunctivitis, or an infection.
I start with warm compresses, using a bean bag or gel mask that is heated in the microwave for about 10 seconds. The compress should be 105° to 110°. They should mask twice a day, every day, for 10 to 15 minutes.64 I also focus on hygiene and ask them to clean their lashes with products that contain hypochlorous acid. They also need 2,000 mg of omega-3 fatty acids daily. I’ll recommend artificial tears if they aren’t using it already; if they are, I’ll consider a prescription medication. Finally, I’ll sometimes recommend ointment at night for any lagophthalmos. Now, if the patient has already done these things, then I’ll recommend thermal technology and medication.

Q | DR. LOH: A patient comes to you with mature cataracts who needs surgery. The cataracts are affecting their vision; they aren’t able to drive. They also have significant OSD. What is your treatment strategy?

Dr. Gupta: It depends on where the patient is starting from. One of the most frustrating symptoms for patients with DED is blurred or fluctuating vision. Many cataract patients come in complaining of this, which is an indicator of dry eye. It’s easy to follow up and ask if it’s a constant blur or a fluctuating blur. If they have fluctuation, you know to look for OSD.
If they have preexisting OSD, I’ll initiate a rapid treatment. I’ll also look at them long term and assess if they are at higher risk for decompensating after surgery. We want to get the best biometry. We want the tear film to be healthy, preoperatively for all those reasons. But we also want patients to feel like they don’t have DED symptoms after surgery.
If a patient has corneal staining, I’ll put them on a topical steroid because it works very quickly.65 For patients with corneal staining and DED, I’ll initiate an antiinflammatory that can be used chronically; cyclosporine and lifitegrast are all good options. These molecules take weeks to months to build full levels, so I initiate them along with a topical steroid. For patients with MGD, I think it’s very important to address it preoperatively. MGD is a very common condition; it has a direct impact on the TBUT. The new therapies mentioned earlier are all great therapies for MGD; they are centered around relieving the obstruction in the meibomian gland. They’re all equally performed in clinic, but some are a bit more titratable. For example, if using an electrothermal controller that delivers regulated and adjustable heat to the upper and lower lids, after the heating treatment is complete, you can use expression forceps to titrate along which segments might be more obstructed.59

Dr. Loh: Say a patient has perfect cataract or refractive surgery, and you’re seeing them postoperatively. They were appropriately treated for dry eye ahead of time, but the surgery initiated dry eye symptoms, like you expected and explained in advance. How do you treat them?

Dr. Bloomenstein: One thing we haven’t mentioned is the use of artificial tears. Over-the-counter artificial tears are an important component of treatment as a short-term, quick fix.66 Steroids are also effective in reducing inflammation quickly. In addition to the short-term treatments, I’ll prescribe cyclosporine or lifitegrast, twice a day, to enhance their tear quality in the long term.

Q | DR. LOH: Dr. O’Dell, you’re a TFOS ambassador, and you work extensively with the committee. How do you relate DEWS II with dry eye?

Dr. O’Dell: TFOS DEWS II gave us a treatment goal, which was very valuable.29 We’re now working toward a common goal; it doesn’t matter what test we use to get there. It also forced us to make sure we haven’t misdiagnosed the patient by employing the LLPP. Sometimes what we think is dry eye isn’t dry eye; it’s basic membrane disease or Demodex mites.67 If we’re not looking at a closed lid or having the patient look down, we might not see the collarettes or the cylindrical dandruff consistent with Demodex mites.
TFOS DEWS II also made it simple with the signs and symptoms. Symptoms can be validated though a questionnaire.68 Signs can be assessed through a simple fluorescein strip, looking for TBUT or a staining pattern consistent with DED. Finally, osmolarity can help you determine if the DED is more aqueous or more evaporative in nature. These algorithms make my job a little easier. It shows me that I’m on the right path. These are what the lead experts are saying we should be looking for, so I use them in my day-to-day clinic.

Dr. Loh: I want to thank everyone for your time and insights. I’ve learned a lot; thank you for the excellent discussion.

REFERENCES
1. Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf 2017;15(3):276-83.

2. Albietz JM. Dry eye: an update on clinical diagnosis, management and promising new treatments. Clin Exp Optom. 2001;84(1):4-18.
3. Markoulli M, Kolanu S. Contact lens wear and dry eyes: challenges and solutions. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2017;9:41-48.
4. Chalmers RL, Young G, Kern J, et al. Soft Contact Lens-Related Symptoms in North America and the United Kingdom. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(8):836-847.
5. Trattler WB, Majmudar PA, Donnenfeld ED, et al. The Prospective Health Assessment of Cataract Patients’ Ocular Surface (PHACO) study: the effect of dry eye. Clin
Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1423-1430.
6. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):334-365.
7. Giannaccare G, Vaccaro S, Mancini A, Scorcia V. Dry eye in the COVID-19 era: how the measures for controlling pandemic might harm ocular surface. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(11):2567-2568.
8. Jaiswal S, Asper L, Long J, et al. Ocular and visual discomfort associated with smartphones, tablets and computers: what we do and do not know. Clin Exp Optom. 2019.
9. Kawashima M, Yamatsuji M, Yokoi N, et al. Screening of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers during occupational health examinations: The Moriguchi study. J Occup Health. 2015;57(3):253-258.
10. Hayirci E, Yagci A, Palamar M, et al. The effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome on the ocular surface. Cornea. 2012;31(6):604-608.
11. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA. Dry Eye Disease: Impact on quality of life and vision. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2013;1(2):51-57.
12. Willcox MDP, Argueso P, Georgiev GA, et al. TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):366-403.
13. Loh K, Redd S. Understanding and preventing computer vision syndrome. Malays Fam Physician. 2008;3(3):128-130.
14. Sánchez-Valerio MDR, Mohamed-Noriega K, Zamora-Ginez I, et al. Dry eye disease association with computer exposure time among subjects with computer vision syndrome. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:4311-7.
15. Chu CA, Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Blink patterns: reading from a computer screen versus hard copy. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(3):297-302.
16. Portello JK, Rosenfield M, Chu CA. Blink rate, incomplete blinks and computer vision syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(5):482-487.
17. Alves M, Novaes P, Morraye Mde A, et al. Is dry eye an environmental disease? Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014;77(3):193-200.
18. Wolkoff P, Nøjgaard JK, Franck C, Skov P. The modern office environment desiccates the eyes? Indoor Air .2006;16(4):258-265.
19. Micera A, Di Zazzo A, Esposito G, et al. Age-related changes to human tear composition. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(5):2024-2031.
20. Paulsen AJ, Cruickshanks KJ, Fischer ME, et al. Dry eye in the beaver dam offspring study: prevalence, risk factors, and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(4):799-806.
21. Resch MD, Marsovszky L, Németh J, et al. Dry eye and corneal langerhans cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:543835.
22. Coursey TG, de Paiva CS. Managing Sjogren’s Syndrome and non-Sjogren Syndrome dry eye with anti-inflammatory therapy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1447-1458.
23. Schargus M, Wolf F, Tony HP, et al. Correlation between tear film osmolarity, dry eye disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. Cornea. 2014;33(12):1257-1261.
24. Bron AJ, Tiffany JM. The contribution of meibomian disease to dry eye. Ocul Surf. 2004;2(2):149-165.
25. Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):438-510.
26. Thulasi P, Djalilian AR. Update in Current Diagnostics and Therapeutics of Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(11s):S27-s33.
27. Pucker AD, Tichenor AA. A Review of Contact Lens Dropout. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020;12:85-94.
28. Arita R, Fukuoka S, Morishige N. Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Contact Lens Discomfort. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43(1):17-22.
29. Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):539-574.
30. Abusharha AA. Changes in blink rate and ocular symptoms during different reading tasks. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2017;9:133-9138.
31. Patel S, Henderson R, Bradley L, et al. Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68(11):888-892.
32. Tsubota K, Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(8):584.
33. Yu Y, Hua H, Wu M, et al. Evaluation of dry eye after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(12):2614-2623.
34. Shtein RM. Post-LASIK dry eye. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2011;6(5):575-582.
35. Ang RT, Dartt DA, Tsubota K. Dry eye after refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12(4):318-322.
36. Solomon KD, Holzer MP, Sandoval HP, et al. Refractive Surgery Survey 2001. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2):346-355.
37. Kenny SE, Tye CB, Johnson DA, et al. Giant papillary conjunctivitis: A review. Ocul Surf. 2020;18(3):396-402.
38. Eydelman M, Hilmantel G, Tarver ME, et al. Symptoms and Satisfaction of Patients in the Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL) Studies. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(1):13-22.
39. Gupta PK, Drinkwater OJ, VanDusen KW, et al. Prevalence of ocular surface dysfunction in patients presenting for cataract surgery evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(9):1090-1096.
40. Gupta PK, Stevens MN, Kashyap N, et al. Prevalence of meibomian gland atrophy in a pediatric population. Cornea. 2018;37(4):426-30.
41. Wise RJ, Sobel RK, Allen RC. Meibography: A review of techniques and technologies. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(4):349-56.
42. Ozcura F, Aydin S, Helvaci MR. Ocular surface disease index for the diagnosis of dry eye syndrome. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2007;15(5):389-393.
43. Abetz L, Venkataraman K, Mertzanis P, et al. The development, reliability and validity of a questionnaire to assess the impact of dry eyes on everyday life (IDEEL). Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2003;44(13):2477.
44. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute visual function questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1050-1058.
45. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea 2001;20(6):610-618.
46. Ngo W, Situ P, Keir N, et al. Psychometric properties and validation of the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness questionnaire. Cornea. 2013;32(9):1204-1210.
47. Chalmers RL, Begley CG, Caffery B. Validation of the 5-item dry eye questionnaire (DEQ-5): Discrimination across self-assessed severity and aqueous tear deficient dry eye diagnoses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(2):55-60.
48. Schaumberg DA, Gulati A, Mathers WD, et al. Development and validation of a short global dry eye symptom index. Ocul Surf. 2007;5(1):50-57.
49. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Patient history in screening for dry eye conditions. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987;58(4):296-301.
50. Chalmers RL, Begley CG, Moody K, et al. Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and opinion of contact lens performance. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(10):1435-1442.
51. Miller DD, Hasan SA, Simmons NL, et al. Recurrent corneal erosion: a comprehensive review. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:325-335.
52. Butrus S, Portela R. Ocular allergy: diagnosis and treatment. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005;18(4):485-92, v.
53. Starr CE, Gupta PK, Farid M, et al. An algorithm for the preoperative diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disorders. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(5):669-684.
54. Kymionis GD, Bouzoukis DI, Diakonis VF, et al. Treatment of chronic dry eye: focus on cyclosporine. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2(4):829-36.
55. Wan KH, Chen LJ, Young AL. Efficacy and safety of topical 0.05% cyclosporine eye drops in the treatment of dry eye syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ocul Surf 2015;13(3):213-225.
56. Chan CC, Prokopich CL. Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% for treatment of dry eye disease: overview of clinical trial program. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;22(1):49-56.
57. Miljanovic B, Trivedi KA, Dana MR, et al. Relation between dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and clinically diagnosed dry eye syndrome in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(4):887-893.
58. Tauber J, Owen J, Bloomenstein M, et al. Comparison of the iLUX and the LipiFlow for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction and symptoms: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:405-418.
59. Badawi D. A novel system, TearCare, for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ). 2018;12:683-694.
60. Greiner JV. Long-term (12-month) improvement in meibomian gland function and reduced dry eye symptoms with a single thermal pulsation treatment. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41(6):524-530.
61. Fraunfelder FT, Sciubba JJ, Mathers WD. The role of medications in causing dry eye. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:285851-.
62. García-Posadas L, Contreras-Ruiz L, Soriano-Romaní L, et al. Conjunctival Goblet cell function: effect of contact lens wear and cytokines. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(2):83-90.
63. Wang MT, Craig JP. Investigating the effect of eye cosmetics on the tear film: current insights. Clin Optom. 2018;10:33-40.
64. Olson MC, Korb DR, Greiner JV. Increase in tear film lipid layer thickness following treatment with warm compresses in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(2):96-99.
65. Pflugfelder SC. Antiinflammatory therapy for dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(2):337-342.
66. Pucker AD, Ng SM, Nichols JJ. Over the counter (OTC) artificial tear drops for dry eye syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:Cd009729.
67. Muntz A, Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, et al. Improved Demodex diagnosis in the clinical setting using a novel in situ technique. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(4):345-349.
68. Belmonte C, Nichols JJ, Cox SM, et al. TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report. Ocular Surf. 2017;15(3):404-437.

Next

Test

Instructions

Step 1 of 2

  • a. 1b. 2c. 3d. 4e. 5
  • a. 1b. 2c. 3d. 4e. 5
  • AgreeNeutralDisagree
    Differentiate between DED and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and summarize the risk factors for DED and MGD
    Explain the role of inflammatory processes in these diseases
    Recognize the signs and symptoms in patients with ocular surface complaints
    Appraise the differences between traditional and new diagnostic tests for DED and MGD
    Compare the newest treatments for DED and MGD with first-generation treatments indicated for those conditions.
Back